I have a bit of a problem staying on topic let alone model......
> On 3/14/07, Roger Prokic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So the question is... Is there any interest in the 680 group that I
>> started? I have a few members and there is some traffic but no where
>> the
>> amount I see here. The intent was that perhaps that version had
>> significant changes and would justify its own group... What do you
>> think?
>>
>> I just read Sam Kamens viewpoint on it. It would make me believe there
>> would be a lack of interest in a 680 only group...
>
> I'm usually skeptical of the merits of further sub-dividing already
> (relatively) small populations, as it tends to (a) run the risk of
> dying altogether, and (b) expose members to a subset of information
> that may not be the best or most complete available.
>
> After all, the only downside is "noise," and since both tools and
> email management techniques are getting better at filtering out
> marginally relevant posts, I'd rather deal with the noise than risk
> eliminating good information. But that may just be me.
>
