WI-Fi built-in
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scandals & Animals Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Treo] Needed Improvements Multi-media capablility. Can play very few media files from a website. -------------------- Scientists report creating a sheep that is 15% human. Why shouldn't they? The public schools have created humans that are 85% sheep. ...... Original Message ....... On 28 Mar 2007 07:51:00 -0400 "Carl W. Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:carl%40palmloyal.com> com> wrote: >Interesting... >Can you list some the things that the Treos are lacking? > >The things that jump out to me are: > >1. Copy to Clipboard Limit >2. No "real" Builtin support for SD cards >- like Versamail not saving to SD >- no card mangement app on most devices. >Example: When you save a zip file from Blazer (Web app), it saves the file in /Palm/Blazer/Downloads/. How would someone get to this without a 3rd party app? >- Apps on Card do not show in normal app launcher screen >- No built-in Backup to SD app > >3. No built-in PDF viewer >4. Conference Calling does not work well and you can't drop any of the callers (my cousin called me on a cell phone and was able to conference 7 people including himself). I can barely conference one person without incident. > >5. Why don't Palm put a standard audio jack on the Treo? I know the decision is partly the carriers decision, but the iPhone wouldn't be so scary if the people could pop in their favorite headphones and listen to their songs and listen to their movies' audio in private. > >All but audio jack and conferencing issues are resolved by 3rd party apps, but Treo should handle these out the box. > >What improves would you like to see in future Treos? > >Thanks, > >Carl W. Brooks >(Sent from my Sprint Treo 650) > >http://www.Palmloya <http://www.Palmloyal.com> l.com >Palm Podcasts, News, Software, Hardware, and More! >-----Original Message----- >From: "Vishal Sheth" <netmaster1975@ <mailto:netmaster1975%40yahoo.com> yahoo.com> >Date: Wednesday, Mar 28, 2007 4:18 am >Subject: RE: [Treo] CNBC Exclusive: Palm Shareholder Expects Motorola Deal Soon > >I think Palm Os is the best. Only thing is that it did not come up with >upgrades, more options with OS and did not integrate the applications to become stronger contender. I'm fan of Palm Os, got 680. There are lots of thing missing as yet. If this can be done I think palm would survive, of course with Linux in backend. > >_____ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> com] On Behalf Of Craig Froehle >Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:35 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> com >Subject: Re: [Treo] CNBC Exclusive: Palm Shareholder Expects Motorola Deal Soon > >On 3/23/07, Jeffrey Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:yahoo%40gordol.org> org> wrote: >The only way PalmOS would >have a secure future with any company is with one that is not already >invested in WinMob/WinSmartphone. > >Nah. Palm has already shown there's wisdom in being diversified (if not agnostic) from an OS point-of-view, so even an existing WM >licensee could produce both for a while and make future decisions >based mainly on sales. Motorola has phones running on at least two >different OS foundations: WM and Linux. So, it could be a good >owner. Impossible to tell, however, if any company would believe that Palm OS' established user community is worth maintaining. When the >number of phones sold each year is in the Billions, several million >die-hard Palm OS fans may or may not be significant. Even people on >this list who've used Palm OS devices for years and years have shown >they're willing to at least _try_ WM or other OSes, so I am skeptical that Palm OS can still claim as widespread a devoted userbase. Me, >I'm in until they stop making them, as I just have way too much >knowledge and expertise invested to switch to something else until I'm forced to (and I have no significant complaints about Palm OS that are really much better anywhere else unless I give up major functionality, too). My 2 cents. > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
