There's a concept worth pondering.

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Don Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

> Isn't that the truth!! However, perhaps as devices with "real" 
> keyboards become more available real spelling will return? IDK. 
> 
> TTFN, 
> Don 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Sam Kamens 
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:06 PM 
> To: [email protected] 
> Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Foleo: The Death of Palm 
> 
> 
> 
> Jeffrey Kaplan wrote: 
> > Hello, Craig Froehle. 
> > 
> > On Thu, 31 May 2007 13:40:21 -0400 you said: 
> > 
> >> Totally non sequitur: I just _now_ figured out that your "forex" 
> term means 
> >> "for example" -- based on your earlier email, I had thought Forex was 
> a 
> >> brand of laptop I'd never heard of. ;-) 
> >> 
> >> Just curious: why write "forex" when "e.g." has fewer letters _and_ 
> is 
> >> already well established to mean the same thing? It'd be like 
> writing 
> > 
> > It's easier to type. 
> > 
> 
> How about just typing "4x" instead? Even quicker... :-) 
> 
> I really do worry about whether my children will be able to spell at 
> all, in this world of text messaging... 
> 
> Sam 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links 
> 
> 
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to