Depends on what you mean by "recent" I guess. The 650 added the replaceable battery over the 600. That was pretty significant. Bluetooth was vastly improved with each new device. Going to miniSD was a mistake in the 755p that I can live with.
Tons of other small improvements each time a new machine came out. Cheers, Don -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Froehle Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Treo] Practical difference between recent treos? The added stability offered by the 128MB of RAM in the 700p and more recent models is one advantage those have over, say, the 650. But other than that, all recent models are fairly similar. Have you considered just getting a Palm OS PDA? They still make them. :-) On 7/5/07, Alli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Outside of the form factor...very little difference at all. > > dvm405 wrote: > > Hello. I wonder if anyone knows what is the practical difference > > between the recent treos. Yes, I have looked at the spec sheets, and > > it seems they are all very similar, and from a practical use point of > > view (that is, the extent of my understanding), they are identical, for > > all intent and purposes. The only significant difference I noticed > > (aside from service providers), is the use of Mini SD versus regular > > SD. A new flash format definitely does not appeal to me, as I have > > money plunked on SD flash already. The other technical differences, I > > do not understand enough to care (Intel vs Xscale, etc). > > > > I am almost tempted to get a treo, and use it as a pda, forget the > > phone (anyone here been there, done that?). And no, no Windows for me, > > Palm is what I like. > > > > Hopefully my question is not clear as mud. > > > > TIA >
