I'm responding to comments made in several different posts on this thread:

1. ShortCut5 being slow versus Textras: I installed SC5 last night and
added maybe 60 shortcuts. Bill was correct. I didn't have any problem
with speed. My earlier question came from the owner's comments
elsewhere relating to why SC5 was slower than Textras:

"The performance impact of ShortCut5 would be the greatest with apps
that generate a lot of events. These would typically be games,
graphical apps, and benchmarks. And of course these are the same types
of apps where you probably won't use ShortCut5. The apps where you
would typically use ShortCut5, like Memo, Address, Datebook, Tasks,
generate very few events. My suggestion would be to only enable
ShortCut5 for the apps in which you really want to use it."

2. ShortCut5 working on more apps than Textras: J Messeder was
correct. Here's what the owner states in the User Guide in the FAQS
section: 

"When a system shortcut (not ShortCut5) is expanded, it places all the
new characters in the queue as keydown events. But the queue is
limited in size. This is why system shortcuts are very small
(typically about 45 character at most). I believe that Textras does
something totally different (I'm just guessing here since I don't 
have access to their source code). Textras modifies the internal data
structures to insert the characters into a PalmOS text field. This is
why the update is quick. The downside is that not all apps uses PalmOS
text fields. Some apps like Docs to Go or WordSmith implement 
their own custom version of text fields (instead of using the ones
provided by the operation system). In this case Textras won't work
(since it does not know the internal data structures these apps are
using). 

ShortCut5 takes the approach like how the system shortcuts work. But
instead of placing all the new characters in the queue, it only puts a
character in after one has been taken out. This is to not overflow the
queue. This is why the update is slow. The upside is that this method
should work in virtually all apps." 

This is interesting but a non-issue to me since the speed is fine and
SC5 works everywhere that I want it to work.

3. Active Words: This is very powerful PC tool that allows the user to
execute commands across all PC apps. It does much more than text
expansion. Simple shortcut commands will find any doc, file, folder,
app, menu, webpage, etc. and open it and execute menu commands.
Anything that can be accomplished with a keyboard can be done with a
one-word command. For example, it can turn off a PC; find Palm
Desktop, open it, open tasks, open a new task, type something, close
everyhting, etc. It performs in-place time, date, and math conversions. 

It is one of the most powerful PC tools one can own and an entire
industry of forums, teachers, systems and databases has sprung up
around it. I believe that its capabilities exceed Google's Desktop
search engine, Mac's Spotlight, RoboForm for PC, TextExpander for Mac,
etc. It has large data bases that correct misspellings, execute web
commands, execute contractions and hyphenations from shortcuts. It has
specific command databases for Google, Palm Desktop, Outlook, etc.

To get a good look at it, go to www.activewords.com. I was very sorry
to leave it behind when I bought a Mac a month ago. Mac has nothing
this comprehensive althouigh there are Mac tools that do some of the
things that it will do.

I hope that helps.

 


Reply via email to