True. Not that I think it changes a lot, but they should have compared it to the Treo 755p and the Treo 750 (WinMo).
A clearly biased article. Next, iPhone x Nokia 6600 (not the shiny new N95). :-) []s Sandro Campos Mancini ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Froehle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [Treo] AppleInsider review: Treo 650 vs. iPhone > Uh, yeah...comparing a brand new, state-of-the-art phone to one that > came out 3 years ago. Gee, I can't imagine which is going to seem > more attractive. > > > On 8/28/07, Romain Kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Food for thought, or fuel for the flames, depending on your perspective: >> >> http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/08/28/iphone_review_series_iphone_vs_palm_treo_650.html >> >> [snip] >> >> The first day I saw the Treo 650, I was impressed with the quality of >> its camera and screen, satisfied with the familiar Palm OS, but somewhat >> disappointed with the rest of it. It's bulky, marginally integrated with >> desktop software, and generally felt stuck in the depressing post-dotcom >> rut that Palm never seemed to shake its way out of; the company has >> since layered into all of its products a burden of grief and despair >> that seems palpable. Palm simply exudes a desperation that reeks of >> death. >> >> [...]
