Dear Roger,

The battery issues I speak of have already been addressed by Apple
spokeswoman Jennifer Hawkes last July.  Not lies, not fabrication and
certainly no propogation here :)

<(Apple issues battery program for iPhone) should make some waves... "A
consumer advocacy group has expressed outrage over Apple Inc.'s battery
replacement program for the iPhone, while developers and hackers are trying
to figure out ways they could expand the capabilities of the hot new gadget.

The hybrid cell phone, iPod media player and wireless Web-browsing device
launched to much fanfare on June 29. On the same day, the Foundation for
Consumer and Taxpayer Rights fired off a letter to Apple and AT&T Inc., the
cell phone's exclusive carrier, complaining that customers were being left
in the dark about the procedure and cost of replacing the gadget's battery.

The iPhone's battery is apparently soldered on inside the device and cannot
be swapped out by the owner like most other cell phones.

Apple spokeswoman Jennifer Hakes said Thursday the company posted the
battery replacement details on its Web site last Friday after the product
went on sale.

Users would have to submit their iPhone to Apple for battery service. The
service will cost users $79, plus $6.95 for shipping, and will take three
business days.>  PDA24/7

And

<A suit against Apple charges the iPhone maker with forcing owners to depend
on the company for frequent battery replacements. Also, new reports reveal
problems with the cellphone's AC power brick.
Lawsuit grills Apple over built-in iPhone battery

A class-action group is accusing Apple of unfairly steering its customers
towards buying frequent and expensive battery replacements from the company
to continue using the iPhone, according to official papers discovered by
Gizmodo.

Represented by lead plaintiff Jose Trujillo, the Illinois-based suit alleges
that the handset's lithium-ion battery will exhaust itself in just 300
charges, which Trujillo claims will last only a year -- guaranteeing that
customers will need to swap the battery on a yearly basis. Omitting an
easily accessible compartment only worsens the situation, he says.

"Unknown to the Plaintiff, and undisclosed to the public prior to purchase,
the iPhone is a sealed unit with it's [sic] battery soldered on the inside
of the device so that it cannot be changed by the owner," the suit notes.

The replacement locks customers into purchasing an $86 replacement from
Apple alone and brings a $29 surcharge for customers who want a temporary
unit, which could be avoided through an easy-access, removable battery pack.
AT&T is also named in the suit and is jointly accused of hiding battery
replacement terms until after the iPhone had been listed for sale.

A victory in the complaint would have both Apple and AT&T pay actual losses
as well as punitive damages to customers who weren't properly warned in
advance of the long-term costs of maintaining a working battery in the
phone.

Apple has not commented on the suit but states that the battery lasts for
far longer, delivering up to 400 charges at peak efficiency and only then
gradually losing power capacity rather than dying altogether.

AC adapter glitches plaguing Apple

Complaints are steadily growing in number that the iPhone's AC adapter has
proven unreliable for early buyers.

A discussion thread on Apple's support website contains a large number of
reports of the stand-alone power unit permanently losing its ability to
recharge the phone. Plugging the iPhone directly into a USB port charges the
device without problems, according to the anecdotes. Other testers have
tried replacing the dock-to-USB cable and different wall outlets, ruling out
other factors that could prevent a steady power supply.

Apple has yet to formally recognize any widespread issues but can replace
the adapter for free as part of the iPhone's hardware warranty.> Apple
Insider

Karen

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Prokic
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 8:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Treo] iPhone price cut

I believe those are all lies you're propogating.

Why would Apple do that?

They've had closed ipods with batteries that last years of recharges...

I think you're reading press that is fabricated by competitors to try to 
hurt iPhone sales.

Roger
---
Roger Prokic
Baltimore, Maryland USA

 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.9/994 - Release Date: 9/7/2007
4:40 PM
 



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/treo/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/treo/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to