An update:

1.  This device keeps setting my time zone to Chicago (Central time),
even though I've told the Treo not to get the time zone from the
network.

2.  Touch tones seem to be affected.  I can't get my answering service
to recognize my password when calling in for messages.  Tried it out on
a land line and it works fine.  I'll experiment further before calling
Sprint, for all the good THAT will do.

Seems like someone at Sprint needs to know the above, if they don't
already.  I'm putting the odds that I'll actually find someone who cares
at slim and none . . . and I think Slim left town!

Still an interesting thing, but if these problems can't be resolved I
can't use the thing. 

Cheers,
Don


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Don Ferguson
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Treo] Sprint Introduces Airave To Help Weak Reception

Well, we'll find out soon since I just picked one up.  

My view of it is a little less cynical, though.  Since I'm in the test
market (Denver) I get the device for free.  I will now be paying
$15/month for unlimited calling while I'm connected to my own little
cell tower in my house.  They say it covers 5000 square feet.  The
footprint of the first floor of my house is 2300 square feet, so I'm
assuming this will work outside to some extent as well.

As a practical matter, that means I can:

1.  Reduce my cellular plan by the number of minutes I typically use the
cell phone from home.

2.  Finally eliminate my second line at home since I'll not only get a
strong, consistent 5-bar signal inside my house, but get all calls
included in the $15.

3.  Possibly eliminate my primary home line at some point since this
service has a GPS-based e911 component. 

In addition, although this doesn't apply to me, this could also allow a
Sprint user with NO reception at home or another location to make
unlimited calls from that location.  A rural mountain user here in
Colorado, for instance, could have Sprint service at home even where
there is no cellular coverage, and the pick up the regular Sprint
network upon entering "civilization".

I will probably always have a land line of some sort since my burglar
alarm uses one, but even now that line has been reduced to just a
$15/month basic line with no extras.  I have VOIP lines that I actually
use (Vonage and Broadvoice) and I have to say that cellular compares
very well in call quality to them.  Now that the "cell tower" will be
right in the house, from the phone's point of view, battery consumption
should be reduced on the Treo as well as it won't have to reach very
hard for a signal.  

I see this as analogous in purpose, but not implementation, to the
T-Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] service:  both are targeted at allowing people to
eliminate a home line.  Each has strengths:  Sprint's offering works
with all Sprint CDMA phones, not just a limited set of special phones.
T-Mobile's offering can work anywhere (especially at Starbucks or other
hotspot) there's a wifi network, not just at one location.  

In an office/home environment, however, since the Sprint device is not
limited to just one phone, one could have a home one of these and an
office one, and do unlimited calls at those two locations for $15/month
each.  Depends on how one uses the setup, I guess, as to which way to
go, but at $15/month this will pay for itself, for me.

Cheers,
Don


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
john.messeder
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 8:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Treo] Sprint Introduces Airave To Help Weak Reception

That was the first thought I had - a new sales approach: instead of 
great service for everyone, Sprint has opted for service /a la carte/.

Lio wrote:
>
> Or are they just charging you for bad service

-- 

/"Thirty-five million deaths leave an empty place at only one family 
table." /
(News commentator Eric Severied in a radio essay on the 25th anniversary

of the start of World War Two. 8/31/64) 

Reply via email to