Obviously, this is just one person's opinion, which he/she is entitled to. Doesn't mean I have to agree with it, which I don't.
--- Michael colin.fletcher wrote: > Two entries on this list: > > > > http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/11/meet_the_10_ugl.ht > ml > > > > Palm > <http://www.informationweek.com/galleries/showImage.jhtml;jsessionid=T4M1520 > 4IW4IKQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN2JVN?galleryID=116&imageID=7> Centro: Palm has never > made attractive smartphones, but its newest kid on the block took every bad > idea in Palm's arsenal and combined them into one shudder-inducing piece of > hardware. I've seen bars of soap that have more personality than the Centro. > And just because it is tiny, that doesn't mean it is hip. While small and > thin has been the design mandate of late, the Centro is what happens when > you let a 10-year-old design a smartphone. > > Palm > <http://www.informationweek.com/galleries/showImage.jhtml;jsessionid=T4M1520 > 4IW4IKQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN2JVN?galleryID=116&imageID=8> Treo 600: The Treo 600 > may have really set the stage for what a smartphone should be with its > larger screen and full qwerty keyboard, but, holy heck, what were its > designers thinking? The ginormous stub antenna has to be the cause of > countless groin injuries to people who stuffed the Treo 600 into their front > pocket. Not only was the stub dangerous, the Treo 600 was so heavy that back > and wrist problems were common complaints from those who carried it about. > The one good thing about it was that mobile professionals on the road could > skip going to the gym and do curls with the Treo 600 in their hotel room > instead. > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
