Dear Craig,
I did understand and said I shall not put mails with high priority, but still people reply to the same. Vishal From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Froehle Sent: 24 December 2007 07:01 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Treo] To Vishal Carl, surely you don't believe that "because it's not a problem for me, it shouldn't be considered a problem by anybody," do you? In general, there are lots of no-nos on mailing lists, including (to name a few): - not trimming your posts - including unreasonably long sigs - attaching large files - going wildly off-topic on a regular basis AND - using "high priority" flags on messages These guidelines are in place to keep things running smoothly, and it's certainly within any list member's rights to request that they be followed. I'd like to suggest that this thread be closed now...it has run its course. Thanks. On 23 Dec 2007 20:09:00 -0500, Carl W. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:carl%40palmloyal.com> > wrote: > This is retarded. I would never know he flagged it priority had someone not mentioned. Talk about making a big deal about nothing. Everyonr must be behaving normally. It's like the Maytag service making up a problem to come out of hibernation. Whatever. > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
