I don't care what they call it, or what they deploy! I'll take any of them... I feel like I have been stuck with EVDO for years... yes, it's great, and some claim Sprint's EVDO network the fastest, but I am ready for change!!!
J From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Levi Wallach Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Treo] Network speeds compared Yep. That brings up a question - since 4G is so close, I'm thinking that Rev. B will never be put into production anywhere. I have heard, though, that Rev. B is something that can be activated within software rather than hardware, so if you have a Rev. A phone or cell tower, presumably it can be upgraded very easily, but given that Wimax and the competing LTE 3 are already being tested in some test markets, why would they bother with it even so? ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> [[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Sam Cayze [[email protected] <mailto:sam.cayze%40rollouts.com> ] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:30 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE: [Treo] Network speeds compared I think 3G is a vanilla term for mobile broadband in general. Sprint EVDO use Rev 0 and Rev A. Rev A being the fastest, and usually avail only in major cities. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
