Nope! ________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of V III Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 6:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Treo] Palm Pre to support Palm OS legacy apps Is this an April Fool's prank? ;) ________________________________ From: Michael M. Rye <[email protected] <mailto:mrye%40wi.rr.com> > To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2009 4:38:07 AM Subject: RE: [Treo] Palm Pre to support Palm OS legacy apps This is awesome news! It's exactly what the Pre needs while developers are getting ramped up on creating native WebOS apps for the device. --- Michael ..... Original Message ....... On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:48:52 -0700 "David Ricketts" <David.Ricketts@ sbcglobal. net> wrote: >http://www.motionapps.com/classic/ <http://www.motionapps.com/classic/> > >Here's the link to the developer. If you click on the Stay Tuned button, you >can list the programs you want to be included and presumably tested for >compatibility. > >David > > > _____ > >From: t...@yahoogroups. com [mailto:t...@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Don >Ferguson >Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 10:33 PM >To: t...@yahoogroups. com >Subject: RE: [Treo] Palm Pre to support Palm OS legacy apps > > > >If it's true, then Handyshopper is once again on the table, and I'm one step >closer to getting a Pre! I really hope Palm does this thing right and it's >an adequate replacement for the BlackBerry . . . > >Cheers, > >Don > >From: t...@yahoogroups. <mailto:treo% 40yahoogroups. com> com >[mailto:treo@ yahoogroups. <mailto:treo% 40yahoogroups. com> com] On Behalf Of >Craig >Froehle >Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:53 PM >To: t...@yahoogroups. <mailto:treo% 40yahoogroups. com> com >Subject: [Treo] Palm Pre to support Palm OS legacy apps > >Guys and gals, this could be HUGE! > >A peek at the Pre at CTIA 2009 revealed a "Classic" icon that is >likely an emulator for Palm OS apps > >See http://bit.ly/ <http://bit.ly/FKFj <http://bit.ly/FKFj> > FKFj for pics > >This is apparently NOT an April Fool's Day joke. > >:-D >- Craig [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
