Thanks. Funny... I found it after I posted. I chalk it up to my never using the 
phone app... I use a speed dial app and universal search to make calls.

I guess it's a bad day for my jumping the gun and asking questions... I am the 
type that usually tries to figure it out before asking. Sorry folks...

Jim
(Via Palm Pre)
On Feb 28, 2010 11:51 AM, George Kontos <[email protected]> wrote: 


 



  


    
      
      
      
I had trouble finding that too when I first got the Pre Plus.  Open the phone 
app. The call log is the icon in the lower right that looks like 3 horizontal 
lines.  Easy once you know. 



George



-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim 
Griffin

Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 8:23 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [Treo] Pre Plus Launch Times -- v1.3.5.1 vs v1.4



Pardon my ignorance...newbie-like question here...how do I get to the call log?



Thx.



Jim

(Via Palm Pre)

On Feb 28, 2010 9:44 AM, George Kontos <[email protected]> 
wrote: 



 



I did a study of the launch times before and after installing the 1.4 update



on my VZW Pre Plus.  I see a slight improvement overall, but nothing to get



excited about.  



Here are the data.  



George



--------------



Palm Pre Plus Launch Times



2/28/2010



- Time to fully load an app



- VZW Palm Pre Plus



(Times shown are the average of 2 samples)



webOS v1.3.5.1 / v1.4



Calendar:  4.5 sec / 4.0 sec



Contacts:  4.75 / 4.5



Email:  4.5 / 4.25



Memos:  5.0 / 5.25



Tasks:  6.0 / 4.0



Phone:  1.5 / 1.5



Call Log:  2.25 / 1.5 



Classic:  25.5 / 26.5



Music:  4.75 / 4.5



Pocket Mirror:  5.75 / 4.75



Splash ID:  5.0 / 4.5



Total of 11 app launch times:



v1.3.5.1: 



69.5 sec.  Mean per app: 6.32 sec



v1.4: 



65.25 sec.  Mean per app: 5.93 sec



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------



Yahoo! Groups Links





    
     

    
    






  
  
  









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to