I think Palm does indeed have a devoted following -- us!   But we 15 or so
regular posters don't count for much I'm afraid.  :-(

George


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
ldouglas
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Treo] RIM Following in Palm's Footsteps

Are they losing money? in danger of losing money?

RIM has one thing Palm didn't have - a large install base, a devoted
following and lock-in with corporate accounts. It's like Apple's hold
on education accounts during the 90's



On 8/5/10, George Kontos <[email protected]> wrote:
>
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/202633/rim_following_in_palms_
footsteps.html
>
> RIM Following in Palm's Footsteps
> PC World Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:50 AM PDT
>
> The BlackBerry Torch and BlackBerry 6 OS could be RIM's swan song the way
> the Palm Pre and WebOS were the beginning of the end for Palm.
>
> -----
>
> RIM revealed the BlackBerry Torch 9800 this week with much fanfare, but
with
> mixed reviews and a lukewarm reception. The launch of the BlackBerry Torch
> seems déjà vu--reminiscent of the hype and reception of the Palm Pre which
> ultimately turned out to be Palm's swan song.
>
> The Torch is supposed to catapult the aging BlackBerry product line to the
> forefront--enabling RIM to compete head to head with cutting edge
> smartphones. RIM set out to embrace the best of what the iPhone-generation
> has to offer while maintaining core BlackBerry features--such as the
> signature physical keyboard--to breathe new life into the stagnant
> BlackBerry brand and give businesses and users a reason to stick with the
> respected--yet waning--smartphone leader.
>
> RIM's next-generation smartphone is better suited to compete against the
> first-generation iPhone, though, than current smartphones like the iPhone
4
> and Droid X. The processor, display, memory, and app market for the
> BlackBerry Torch are all abysmally inferior to what Apple and Google have
to
> offer.
>
> Based on the initial reaction and early reviews for the BlackBerry Torch,
it
> seems like the device offers little real competition for the current
> generation of smartphones. However, the BlackBerry Torch could still be a
> success by some measures because the captive audience of business
> professionals locked into the BlackBerry culture will embrace the inferior
> device because it is still better than the other devices RIM has to offer.
>
>
> Combined with the struggles RIM is facing over security and privacy issues
> with the governments of India, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia,
> and the snub of the European Commission--selecting the Apple iPhone and
HTC
> smartphones over the RIM BlackBerry platform for its employees--the future
> of RIM doesn't look very bright.
>
> It seems like it's only a matter of time until RIM follows in Palm's
> footsteps and ends up on the auction block. Apple and Google already have
> superior smartphone and tablet platforms, but there is a struggling
> smartphone competitor out there uniquely suited to take advantage of a RIM
> purchase: Microsoft.
>
> Microsoft could be like the New York Yankees of smartphones--spending
money
> to make up for a lack of in-house talent and buy its way to the top.
> Purchasing RIM and incorporating--or cannibalizing--its intellectual
> property could enable Microsoft to leapfrog competing smartphone platforms
> like iPhone and Android.
>
> Initial reviews of Windows Phone 7 suggest that Microsoft will soon have a
> more compelling smartphone platform to offer even without purchasing RIM.
> But, if Microsoft could successfully merge Windows Phone 7 into the
> established corporate culture built around the RIM BlackBerry platform, it
> could finally have the dominant presence it rightfully should have in the
> business smartphone arena.
>
> There were about eleven months between the launch of the Palm
Pre--heralded
> as an "iPhone killer"--and the sale of the company to HP. Where will RIM
be
> this time next year?
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





Reply via email to