Another point of view. As an employee of Red Hat, I am certainly a believer in open source software. However, I also believe that there is room in this world for commercial software too. I like the idea that there are both Free and Open Source options as well a commercial offerings that range from free (with restrictions) to quite expensive.
For me, the workflow in EAGLE makes sense. I like the way that devices have both schematic and footprint elements and the two views are dynamically linked. I am not saying this is better - it just feels better to me. I also like the support EAGLE has from component manufacturers, solution providers like Sparkfun and PCB services such as OSHPark though I know KiCad also have some great integrations too. I have a philosophy that if you care about a product or service, you should contribute to it. For free and open source software, that could be contributing code, sharing footprints or designs or simply providing advice or tutorials. For commercial software, if you want that software to exist over time (and as your library of PCBs grows this will become important to you) you should plan to pay. I pay for EAGLE and, I have been very impressed with the improvements Autodesk has delivered since they acquired EAGLE. If I stop seeing value in the investment I make in EAGLE, I will stop subscribing. However, after two years, I am very happy with the product, its roadmap and the support I have received. So, I would encourage you to take a look at EAGLE. See if the workflow makes sense to you and compare it to KiCad and others. Make the choice but be prepared to contribute to the community or the company who delivers the solution you choose. Thanks, Chip On March 26, 2019 at 1:00:05 PM, [email protected] ( [email protected]) wrote: Send TriEmbed mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of TriEmbed digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: PCB Design Software Question (John Vaughters) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:35:41 +0000 (UTC) From: John Vaughters <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TriEmbed] PCB Design Software Question Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" +1 on KiCAD because if I am going to spend time on something I do not want restrictions. I am not a PCB designer, we always had people that specialized in the that skill, but I was very familiar to the PCB manufacture and assembly. So when I give you my experience on KiCAD, I am not biased, but understand I was deeply aware of the process. For me, I installed KiCAD to create schematics, then one day decided to turn a simple circuit I built on a proto board into a full GERBER file set just to see how hard it was. No Joke, it was only a few hours, but it was a very simple circuit, however, that is not the point, I had GERBER files and quickly. Meaning, the process to convert my schematic to a GERBER set was intuitive and reasonably simple. PCB design is not simple, so don't misunderstand. But the process to me was simple in terms of learning how to do it in KiCAD.? Again, I knew what I needed and I understand that many don't. So add that to the learning process, but the general PCB knowledge is needed no matter what software you use. "Luke, Use the Netlist" Good Luck in whatever you decide to use. PCB design can be grueling. John Vaughters On Tuesday, March 26, 2019, 10:20:33 AM EDT, Brian via TriEmbed < [email protected]> wrote: On 3/25/19 11:08 PM, Dwight Morgan via TriEmbed wrote: > Thanks Carl. I downloaded Eagle and will bear down on learning it. I?ve > used AutoCad before so I?m hoping there is a wee bit of familiarity. > There should be some good tutorials for it. > > Dwight Hi Dwight, I strongly encourage you to pick KiCad over Eagle, if you're going to invest the time to learn the software.? KiCad is certainly different from Eagle (I don't know whether I'd say "harder"), but its real claim to fame as far as I'm concerned is that it's free software.? Eagle's "free" version limits you to two layers and (when last I cared about it) 100x160 mm routing area (i.e. board size). Of course, the main drawback to KiCad is lack of manufacturer support in terms of symbol and footprint libraries. I'm also a contributing developer to KiCad, so add a grain or two of salt to my comments. Another option is PCB Artist, found at https://www.4pcb.com/free-pcb-layout-software/ I've never used it, but it claims to be free and unrestricted, and have a half-million-part library. Cheers, -Brian _______________________________________________ Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list To post message: [email protected] List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: mailto: [email protected]?subject=unsubscribe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < http://mail.triembed.org/pipermail/triembed_triembed.org/attachments/20190326/1738259a/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ TriEmbed mailing list [email protected] http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org ------------------------------ End of TriEmbed Digest, Vol 70, Issue 11 ****************************************
_______________________________________________ Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list To post message: [email protected] List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
