So some other circuitry connects the individual batteries to the charger(s) some how?

These relays are cycled what, a few times a day at most? I think depending on part selection they could last a very very long time if genuine parts from a vendor with a reputation to protect. Look for automotive ratings.

I shouldn't have used the term "Rube Goldberg". That was with my application in mind, not yours. As Shane pointed out it could be straight forward.

-Pete

This <http://triembed.org/images/relays-schematic.pdf> is a Rube Goldberg circuit. :-)

On 3/22/20 8:20 PM, Charles West wrote:
@Pete
I'm glad you guys are OK.  The crux of the issue is that I haven't seen any LiFEPO4 charger ICs that handle more than 7 cells in series.  Each of my three batteries have 4 cells in them, so I think I need to have one charger for each battery which charges the 4 cells of the battery in series.

I only get 1-2 hrs of working time a day right now due to my daughter's pre-school shutting down, so it will be a little while before I get a functional schematic out.  However, I was tentatively thinking of using the following components: NMosfets (used for all): https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/ON-Semiconductor/NVMFS5C612NLAFT1G?qs=%2Fha2pyFadugLwIkhTqkZTKk6f9YgRBDTRk6R4I0d7T5BfE4p4JIMyYRpkPiujU25 High side NMosfet driver (for NMosfets which are not connected to ground): https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Analog-Devices-Linear-Technology/LTC7003EMSEPBF?qs=sGAEpiMZZMve4%2FbfQkoj%252BKKapMsNT2INsri6aFIMPoQ%3D Single battery charger (would use 3 of these with a 24V supply): https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Texas-Instruments/BQ24630RGER?qs=sGAEpiMZZMsZtvfwwjgKgY9Zc%252BP5Y9S3

Same schematic with auto-annotation:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19qjaiqOR5wqI34htY-u9LFqNepMjd0cY/view?usp=sharing

Apologies if I wasn't clear.  I've annotated the schematic.  WIth the updated one M1, M3, M5 would be on and M2. M4 off during "normal" operation, resulting in ~36V from the 3 ~12v cells.  During charging, M1, M3, M5 would be off and M2, M4 would be on.  The idea is that M1, M3, M5 control charge moving from the high side of a battery to the low side of the next one, so disabling them isolate the cells from each other.  The charger ICs seem to expect the low end of the batteries to be connected to ground, so M2, M4 being on makes that happen.

Given that during series ("normal") operation, M1, M3, M5 have an approximately 0 voltage difference between source and drain (and M5 requires a gate voltage relative to ground higher than the 24V the charger is getting), I think a gate driver with a charge pump is needed to drive the those 3 mosfets.  Does all of that make sense?

Relays would be great in terms of functionality but I'm a little worried about reliability.  The hub motors I'm using are brushless & direct drive with a lower mechanical load than they were designed for, so they might last a fairly long time.  It would certainly simplify the design though.

Thanks,
Charlie

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 3:57 PM Shane Trent via TriEmbed <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Charlie,

    It doesn't surprise me that Pete beat me to the punch on
    mentioning relays after you said "one battery at a time". I expect
    Pete and I share similar ideas. My though was connect each battery
    to the COM terminals of a DPDT relay and use the Normally Closed
    (NC) contacts to wire the batteries in series. When AC power is
    available for charging, you can use the relay's to pull one
    battery at a time out of the chain, check its voltage and charge
    if needed.

    You would have the clack of mechanical relays but adding just two
    MOSFETs should let you get the full expected mechanical life-cycle
    from the relays. Include a strong N-type MOSFET at the bottom of
    your battery chain and in the ground lead of your charger (keeping
    the charger isolated from the circuit until that FET is enabled.
    These FETs allow you to ensure there is no current flowing when
    you open or close the contacts of the relays.

    I expect the life-span of the relays will be more than sufficient
    to outlive the motors/gear train on the project. And using relays
    would make the functioning of the charging circuit easier to
    follow. Additionally, you can buy a off-the-shelf relay board for
    prototyping (I have used NCD boards on multiple projects). Let me
    know if you have any questions.

    
https://store.ncd.io/product/4-channel-dpdt-signal-relay-controller-4-gpio-with-i2c-interface/


    Good luck with your project,
    Shane

    On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 3:27 PM Pete Soper via TriEmbed
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hi Charlie! Jenny, Emily and I are well and happy.

        Your circuit made me chuckle, 'cause when I was thinking of
        your earlier posting I was going to share the scheme I
        intended to use for charging a capacitor with a string of
        microbial fuel cells by switching then between parallel and
        series connections. But that was at silly low currents were
        analog multiplexer chips would work. But the prototype was
        using relays. If you're interested I could dig up the
        schematic. Definitely the Rube Goldberg approach with relays,
        though, but your "one battery at a time" requirement would
        make it simpler. :-)

        Your schematic implies wanting to just charge one battery at a
        time, but I can't see your circuit working past an initial
        point. But I think it's in the right direction. (Nit: your
        schematic symbols are for some kind of very generic FET
        transistor and I'm sure you'd be using high current ones with
        body diodes, right? Bigger nit: if there were part numbers we
        could more easily reason about the wiring).

        So numbering the transistors from left to right as Q1-5, then
        with Q2 and Q3 off but the others on, that's "normal mode",
        right? With Q1-3 off but Q4 and 5 on a lower voltage could
        charge the third battery. But I don't see how you go beyond
        there with this circuit.

        Or am I misunderstanding this? At a minimum you'd have to
        arrange for your single-battery charging voltage to reach the
        positive sides of the first two batteries, right? So maybe
        have Q6 and Q7 between the right side supply and the "positive
        side" of Q1 and Q3, using the Q3 and Q5 to disconnect paths as
        needed and then perhaps a  Q8 and Q9 to select between running
        the system to conduct the higher "all in series" battery
        voltage to the load and the lower, charger voltage to the one
        of three batteries. That is, a SPDT switch above the rightmost
        net going upwards in your schematic.

        Alternatively, figure out how laptop batteries are handled.
        They seem to be always one big series connection, but maybe
        the extra connection pins we see are for this same approach? I
        have no clue about that.

        -Pete

        On 3/22/20 1:09 PM, Charles West via TriEmbed wrote:
        Hey Carl!

        I'm glad to hear that you are doing well.  The 12v batteries
        have built in balancers/protection. It's isolation for
        charger that I'm trying to figure out.  I think I have a
        potential solution
        
(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JxSStAuKn-OMZUCreYQjGUVy5fR2ADpU/view?usp=sharing)
        with the NMOSFETs between each battery needing a high side
        driver.  The idea is that when the batteries are operating
        normally, you turn on the between battery mosfets and disable
        the to ground mosfets, then inverse for charging.

        Does that make sense to you guys?

        Thanks,
        Charlie

        On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 4:42 PM Carl Nobile
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hey Charley,

            We're doing ok, I'm working from home 100% of the time now.

            This may not be the exact answer to your issue but it may
            help. Banggood has a lot of LiIon battery protection
            boards. You may be able to use one of these, it would
            make the actual charger a bit simpler.

            
https://www.banggood.com/search/liion-battery-protection.html?from=nav

            ~Carl


            On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:17 AM Charles West via TriEmbed
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Hello all!

                I hope the virus hasn't affected you guys too badly. 
                My little family's been pretty much staying in our
                house for the last week and a half (since our
                daughter's preschool closed), but we are doing OK
                overall.

                The work on the sidewalk robot continues!  I'm in the
                middle of testing a brushless motor controller/MCU
                combination to drive the four hub motors that will be
                moving the Mk3 robot.  If all goes well, it will be
                built like a tank and strong enough that I could ride
                on it if I wanted to.

                The part I'm trying to figure out is battery
                charging/system protection.  The motors expect 36V,
                so I'm putting 3 4s LiFePO4 batteries in series to
                provide it.  What I'm not really sure about is how to
                integrate a charger.  Each of the batteries
                (batteries
                
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07Q7FY8CC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1>)
                is meant to substitute for a 12V lead-acid
                motorcycle? battery, with its own built in cell
                balancer.  I'm hoping to charge them with power from
                a 24V DC regulator, potentially with a simple 2
                terminal charging dock.

                The issue I'm running into is that none of the
                charger ICs I'm looking at can handle 12 cells in
                series (and they would probably require 40V or so if
                they did). I'm thinking that I should be able to have
                a seperate charger IC for each battery, but I'm not
                entirely clear on how you would charge them in
                parallel while having them connected in series.  I'm
                sure you can do it, because my other charger does it
                for Lithium polymer, but I'm not sure what the
                configuration would look like.

                If I may ask, do you have any ideas?

                Thanks,
                Charlie
                _______________________________________________
                Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

                To post message: [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                List info:
                http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
                TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
                To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
                mailto:[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe



-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Carl J. Nobile (Software Engineer)
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


        _______________________________________________
        Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

        To post message:[email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
        List 
info:http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
        TriEmbed web site:http://TriEmbed.org
        To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank 
message:mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

        _______________________________________________
        Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

        To post message: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        List info:
        http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
        TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
        To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
        mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe



-- photo
        
    *Shane D Trent*
    Patent Agent

    919-348-0061 <tel:919-348-0061> | [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>

    ShaneTrent.com <http://ShaneTrent.com> | Skype: skype:shane.trent1
    <#m_-7674261523543827778_SignatureSanitizer_SafeHtmlFilter_>

    Raleigh, North Carolina

    <http://www.linkedin.com/in/shanetrent>       <http://twitter.com/sdtrent>


    Create your own WiseStamp email signature
    
<https://www.wisestamp.com/signature-in-email/?utm_source=promotion&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=create_your_own&srcid=5623268815667200>

    _______________________________________________
    Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

    To post message: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    List info:
    http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
    TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
    To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
    mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe

_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

To post message: [email protected]
List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: 
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to