On 1/8/21 10:42 AM, Gregg Tracton via TriEmbed wrote:

I disagree that these are all good points.


Ads pay the bills. Who pays the bills for the mailist?

I do. The cost is about 1/10 as much as I've lost with bad biz decisions in six months. Figuring this list is 10% of my personal domain server fees that's vaguely $50 so far for the past seven years, and if it was a burden people would fall all over themselves to relieve me of it. A virtual hat was passed and the domain registration is paid up until 5/25/2027. Ads we don't agree to are not my idea of a community service. I long ago passed on somebody's urging that we monetize the web site, let alone the email list. I've even hesitated to put a badge on the site to publish the tiny ISP that's kept things going for me with amazing availability numbers for over 20 years.

I would offer Google Hangouts to consider, where the entire stream of content is persistent and, with enough back flips, possible to archive. Except Google is putting a bullet through Hangouts' head in a few months and I'm not happy about the traffic going through their systems anyway and so I doubt I'd want to contribute to that change. (Of course: 90+% of you use Gmail, so this might seem moot). I'm told everybody should use the new "improved" Google Meet that segregates the AI training chat to a separate app. And Meet works very, very well for audio and video but the built in chat bites.

In my opinion a valid complaint is the limit on message sizes and some forms of multimedia files being banned (by my ISP and he won't budge because the vast majority of his users are on Windows systems and many might still be W95!). Nobody has yelled much about this, to my amazement. But my ISP deal is killer: if we need more space we can get it, so bumping the posting size limit from 250kilobytes is not cast in stone.

The amateur radio contesting list I'm on (also a GNU Mailman list) is an overflowing fountain of useful information, friendly exchanges, comradery, people bailing others out of crisis situations (software with radio contesting is COMPLEX these days and Murphy waits until five minutes into the BIG CONTEST before hosing you), etc. And yes, it's old farts (guestimate median age of 58 and close to zero under 30). But it's because we can get the *whole story* about poorly or maliciously designed social media choices that if forced to move to FB there would be very strong push back by many of the guys (yes, guys: amateur radio in this country is roughly as sexist as so many other tech cliques and the contesters are about 3X 'cause of extra layers of hangups that create a very strong repulsion field). Actually, it's more fundamental than that. The guy who has kept that list going for the past 25 years would simply refuse to switch to FB and that would be the end of it, 'cause that group is run by a half a shoestring too and nobody, but nobody would look forward to owning a GNU Mailman list who hasn't had any contact  with "computing in the old days" because it is simply alien compared to modern approaches. But there is no walled garden with our list. It could be moved to another  server in an hour's time by my ISP coordinating with others.


And the PRO's are overwhelming: deleting posts (ex, to limit the spread of
That's been a hypothetical with this list: it is impossible to delete a post from the archive without begging to the ISP, and this has never happened with this list. Instead we're extremely careful to vet subscribers, but the bad actors are absolutely obvious like [email protected] . But maybe I misunderstood your use of "PRO".
a bad link), simple polls, splitting broadcasts from conversations, or a Q&A
requirement that qualifies members for joining, like:
  name a circuit you're familiar with.
  what's the functional difference between a robot and a cyborg?

That doesn't wash. The email traffic level is less than trivial. Getting on the email list is less than trivial: mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . I just tried it, and from clicking on the main page, then email, then the admin link took less than 10 seconds. Hmm, maybe should have this at the bottom of postings and a button on the main web page.

But finally, this has all happened before. Before Internet was Arpanet and before that was UUCP along with a vast but less sophisticated bulletin boards, both driven by dialup modems. Remember usenet? Remember the extraordinarily deep, broad discussions roughly segregated by categories? That worked extremely well. There wasn't the division of modern social media as much as fractured, bruised and battered egos, chronic degeneration to ad hominem when somebody runs out of logical arguments, etc. It was people being people, the trolling was easier to see, but also the demographics of the participants was profoundly different in contrast to after the Internet opened comms up to almost everybody. But apart from (debatable) demographic changes being a proximal cause of negativity I think one reason for the difference is that it wasn't monetized, most especially not by folks who /do not have users best interests as their highest priority/. In my opinion search and social media business models and people's perfectly human but apparently unbounded greed have all but destroyed journalism, most especially at the local level, and the rest, as they say, is history.

-Pete

Enjoy the faux snow today
-gregg

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:31 AM John Vaughters via TriEmbed <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    It's a new decade, email lists just aren't kool anymore. Can't
    remember the last Trilug or TAR email. Over all the email lists in
    my life, TriEmbed is the last one that even has some activity. So
    Kudos to this group, no matter how small for keeping that torch
    and thanks to the organizers that keep it going.

    I remember a discussion in my early 30's with a then retiree. This
    question I posed, "I wonder what technology will expire my
    participation in the world?" Turns out I have the answer. Social
    Media. `,~)

    Of course like all young foolish peeps like I was, I thought, "My
    generation is more flexible, more adaptable to change because we
    grew up in a tech changing world?" I even floated the possibility
    in the conversation. But the truth is I knew human nature and
    history too well even then. I knew that most of us stop being the
    hip crowd at some point in life.

    I just can't do social media. No interest there what so ever.

    But there you have it, a generational divide. I do not mean to
    apply my thoughts to any single individual other than me, but I do
    think I am just an example of many in my generation. Most people
    end up being divided in some form or manner and technology is a
    big divider. Just like my Grandparents always needed their VCR
    clock set. Just like I hand my phone to my daughter to fix crap I
    just don't really care about. I can keep the lights on by
    maintaining power plants, but I could care less about the silly
    world of Social Media. But isn't that my divide? Of course it is.

    Not saying I don't use it, but I am saying I generally don't like it.

    Have a fine day,

    John Vaughters





    On Friday, January 8, 2021, 8:53:14 AM EST, Pete Soper via
    TriEmbed <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:





    The web site has a meeting reminder now with bread crumbs to the
    Jitsi URL.

    The TriEmbed email list subscriptions have been (99.9%) monotonically
    decreasing for a few years. It is a shame the TAR list was lost in
    case
    a set difference could have been used for invitations to this
    list. So
    goes life.


    -Pete



    _______________________________________________
    Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

    To post message: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    List info:
    http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
    <http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org>
    TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org <http://TriEmbed.org>
    To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
    mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe


    _______________________________________________
    Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

    To post message: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    List info:
    http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
    <http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org>
    TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org <http://TriEmbed.org>
    To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message:
    mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe



--
Gregg Tracton: tired, retired & inappropriately unattired (PJ's)

_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

To post message: [email protected]
List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: 
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

To post message: [email protected]
List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: 
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to