The Q&A below suggests recording Jitsi sessions is straight forward.
Can anybody translate this into terms of our current use of Jitsi for TriEmbed meetings? Is it feasible for us to use this with an expectation of reliability and practicality? If it would involve a fee to the folks running the server we're using now for a QOS (quality of service) agreement, does anybody know how much would it might be?
Does anybody have a sense of how many folks could be in a Jitsi meeting as we've been using it before the services cry uncle? My attendance has been too unreliable for me to have a sense of whether, for instance, 15 is OK but 20 seems to be too much (if there have been 20).
Are their third party Jitsi service providers out there with definite QOS guarantees?
Finally, last year the strong rumor was that Firefox played better with Jitsi in terms of resource consumption as well as seamless operation compared to other browsers. Is there any data about this out and about?
-Pete
_______________________________________________ Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list To post message: [email protected] List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
