Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-trill-irb-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-irb/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - section 5: The tenant ID is sometimes described as "globally unique" and sometimes (in 5.2) as "throughout the campus." The latter seems likely correct to me. (As an aside, is this document the first to introduce that concept to TRILL?) - section 8: If IS-IS security is not actually used, (is that the current deployment reality btw?) and if I can guess a tenant ID then what new mischief can happen? If there is some, then perhaps you ought recommend that tenant ID's be randomly selected within the campus? (I see you use "1" in the example, which is pretty easy to guess:-) I think one could argue that that (and maybe more) ought be covered in section 8, if the current deployment reality is that no crypto is actually used to protect most IS-IS traffic. Is it? _______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
