Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization-06: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-arp-optimization/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 3.2 discusses several options for obtaining an answer to a ND query. The section also mentions SEND, which prevents spoofing of results by the bridge itself. I believe it would be useful though to make a clearer recommendation on what to do with regards to the different options on obtaining an answer. Some of them are compatible with SEND, some of them are not. Also, how does one know SEND is being used? Perhaps the document could specify a configurable mode where SEND is assumed to be in use and then you could not use the options that make this problematic. Or, perhaps better, if a node has been observed as using send, then use the correct option for that node. _______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
