On 7/7/16, 10:26 AM, "Donald Eastlake" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>I still think (non blocking comment) that treating a received non-zero >>value as an error adds unnecessary complexity if it can just be ignored. >>If the Scope feature is ever revived (or any other feature that wants to >>use the field) then it can change the behavior then. > >Well, perhaps we can agree to disagree. Yes, we can. :-) _______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
