<WG chair hat off>
Support. 1) No personal knowledge of ECN requirements in deployed networks – so I cannot comment on this one. 2) Draft provides a technical mechanism that is sufficiently mature for WG to adopt? 3) No concern regarding this mechanism. Sue Hares From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:40 AM To: Mohammed Umair; Susan Hares; [email protected] Cc: Donald Eastlake; Alia Atlas Subject: RE: [trill] WG Adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-ecn-support/ Support. Linda From: trill [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 8:54 PM To: [email protected] Cc: 'Donald Eastlake'; 'Alia Atlas' Subject: [trill] WG Adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-ecn-support/ This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-ecn-support. Please consider: 1) Does this draft aid deployments of ECN and help remove congestion? 2) Does this draft represent a technical mechanism that is sufficiently mature for the WG to adopt? 3) Do you have any concerns regarding this mechanisms? You can obtain the draft at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-trill-ecn-support/ Sue Hares and Jon Hudson .
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
