Hi Sue, Thanks for the checking. The changes are so incorporated into the updated version. Ready to take more comments from the publication call.
Mingui From: trill [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 7:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [trill] FW: Mail regarding draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation Forwarding to trill mailing list. Sue From: Susan Hares [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 6:13 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 'Donald Eastlake'; 'Mingui Zhang' Subject: Mail regarding draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation Minqui, Xudong, Donald, Radia, and Somnath: In double checking the draft-ietf-trill-mtu-neogitation-05.txt before sending it to the IESG, I found 2 spelling errors and 2 places were the sentence grammar could be improved. These are listed below. Alia has reviewed this draft so these changes can be taken care of after Alia has reviewed again the text. Page 8, #2 leaving, #a sentence 3, #b sentence 2 - spelling error Old:/orgiatingL1LSPBufferSize/ New:/originatingL1LSPBuffer Size/ Page 9, section 5, line 3 OLD /that port SHOULD be disabled and, in any case, an adjacency cannot be formed/ New1 /that port SHOULD be disable since in any case an adjacency cannot be formed/ New2 /that port SHOULD be disabled since, in any case, an adjacency cannot be formed/ You can use either one of the NEWs Page 9, section 6, paragraph 2, line 2 Old/but are processed normally if received larger than that./ New/but are processed normally if received larger than that size./ I asked for IESG publication as you will probably get more editorial comments. Sue Hares Shepherd
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
