Support. The support of P2MP BFD in TRILL is essential for TRILL multicast failure detection.
Regards, Vero 发件人: trill [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Zhangmingui (Martin) 发送时间: 2017年3月9日 21:38 收件人: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi); Susan Hares; [email protected] 抄送: [email protected] 主题: Re: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20) Support. Multi-poing BFD can be used by TRILL distribution trees. Thanks, Mingui ________________________________ From: trill [[email protected]] on behalf of Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi) [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 14:57 To: Susan Hares; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20) Support as co-author of this draft. Also am not aware of any IP related to this draft. Thanks Prasad From: trill [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 9:55 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20) We did not receive any comments on the WGLC for draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07692.html). Perhaps this was because I started the WG LC during Chinese new year. We will try a second WG LC before declaring “no support for this draft” In your comments please consider, 1) Does the support of multi-point BFD aid deployments? 2) Are the suggested additions to RFC7177 bootstrapping sufficient for this technology? 3) Do you feel this technology is ready for standardization? Sue Hares
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
