Hi, I support this draft and think it is ready for standardization.
Regards Mallik ------------------------------------------ From: "Susan Hares" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:53:04 -0500 Message-ID: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01A0_01D28138.BDA69B90" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdKBYcaNCIttSHamSIWQlu+T7bZSDw== Content-Language: en-us X-Authenticated-User: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/54KtM2G6PXjIttN8nEGyMDHMOgM> Cc: 'Donald Eastlake' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 'Jon Hudson' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 X-BeenThere: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:57:33 -0000 This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd. The draft can be obtained at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd/ In your comments please consider, 1) Does the support of multi-point BFD aid deployments? 2) Are the suggested additions to RFC7177 bootstrapping sufficient for this technology? 3) Do you feel this technology is ready for standardization? Sue Hares Trill Co-chair
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
