Hi Ben, Yes, "minimum acceptable" is exact. This will be incorporated into the next version.
Thanks, Mingui > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 5:56 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-06: > (with COMMENT) > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - 2, first paragraph: "This document specifies a new value "Lz" for the > acceptable inter- > RBridge link MTU size on a local link." > > Should "acceptable" be "minimum acceptable"? > _______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
