My apologies, I was reviewing the wrong version of this document and I see that additional text has been added to the -07 to address this.
Thanks, Alissa > On Jul 5, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Alissa Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I think it would help if the explanation of the assumptions and/or references > mentioned in the Gen-ART review could be added. > > _______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
