I support its publication. The document is well shaped to follow and is potentially a useful feature for scalable DC.
Thanks, Yizhou From: trill [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Radia Perlman Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 2:13 PM To: R Parameswaran <[email protected]> Cc: Donald Eastlake <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [trill] Working group LC on draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-04 (9/27 I too support the publication of this document. The document seems well written. Although I get nervous about features that can create loops if misconfigured, this is not a problem with using this feature for TRILL any more than using IS-IS for IP. Since people seem to have it successfully deployed for IP, and find it useful, it should be equally useful for TRILL. I think the draft is ready for publication. Radia On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:57 PM, R Parameswaran <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I support the adoption/standardization of this draft. Comments inline. thanks, Ramkumar This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-04.txt. During this WG last call please include comment on the following three things in addition to your normal comments: 1) Does this draft support the things you desire to support multiple topology routing of unicast and multi-destination traffic in TRILL? [RP]: Yes. 2) Do you think this draft is read for publication? [RP]: Yes, quick look-through, seems correct. 3) Do you think that multi-topology trill has a place in the data center deployments of TRILL? [RP] Yes. Sue Hares and Jon Hudson Co-chairs TRILL _______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
