Hi,
I support the adoption of this draft, please see inline: TRILL WG: This is a WG adoption call for draft-eastlake-trill-vendor-channel-03.txt (11/15 to 11/29). In this WG Adoption call please consider, 1) Is this vendor specific message channel useful to deployments? [RP]: Yes, the draft provides a framework for potentially useful extensions, allows vendor specific features, feature prototyping etc.. 2) Is this mechanism ready for standardization? The TRILL WG group must move rapidly from adoption of this draft to WG LC in December? [RP]: Yes in my opinion - I had one suggestion on the body of the text - it may be useful to add a sentence in Section 3.1 that the flags in the Channel Header and the semantics of the SL bit are defined in RFC 7178, may help readers put this draft in context. 3) Do you know of any IPR related to this draft? [RP]: Not aware of any IPR relating to this draft. thanks, Ramkumar Susan Hares
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
