Hi Kathleen,

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Kathleen Moriarty
<kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00: No Objection
> ...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Could you please expand the text in the security considerations section as to
> why security properties (integrity, authentication, and encryption since they
> are not part of RBridge Channel messages except when explicitly added on in 
> the
> extension draft) were not built in?  I'm assuming it is the limited scope of
> use for the protocol.  I am glad that options exist to add it in, but wish the
> text were a bit more encouraging so that would actually happen.  Vendors need
> to be motivated to provide these options for customers who may want to use
> them, without that motivation, the features won't be provided.


 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA

trill mailing list

Reply via email to