> Actually, the way I heard it was that Linus was applying Rik's patches > haphazardly, picking and choosing, and that was why the VM was so > broken. AA's VM may work okay, but I don't think there was anything > fundamentally wrong with Rik's (except in how it was applied to released > kernels). I also think Rik's new VM (the reverse mapping VM based on > similar BSD work) holds a lot more promise than anything else out > there...
Yeah thats nice, my comments were posted regarding the kernel basically in truth VMs fall under my toaster category. I don't really care why it works or doesn't work so long as it does. At present it looks like this VM has reached a stable state in the kernel and this kernel has reached a stable state. Personally I could give a flip about kernel politics. In the end run, you can have all the special VM pached kernels all you like but this is what we're stuck with going forward for awhile. As for why, how, the path not taken dunno and dunno dun particularly care. Thats just how I feel about that whole issue. -Andy -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh
