On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 21:43, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/vi/pics/vi.lover.gif > > would this be considered offensive?
Absolutely! Now, if it said "Emacs Lover" it would be alright. :-) Tanner P.S. Actually, it doesn't look too bad to me. -- Tanner Lovelace | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://wtl.wayfarer.org/ --*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-- GPG Fingerprint = A66C 8660 924F 5F8C 71DA BDD0 CE09 4F8E DE76 39D4 GPG Key can be found at http://wtl.wayfarer.org/lovelace.gpg.asc --*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-- Those who are willing to sacrifice essential liberties for a little order, will lose both and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure. -- Justice Thurgood Marshall, 1989
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
