On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 11:20, Jeff Bollinger wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Excellent!! Let's hope this works out for the best. By the way, I was > curious, does anyone on this list have an inkling as to exactly what > portions of code were, <ahem> "stolen"?
I think that's one of the issues that makes people so mad about this -- SCO won't say what portions are in dispute. Which makes people suspect even more that the whole purpose of SCO's actions is FUD -- just like Novell's Messman says in the press release at http://www.novell.com/news/press/archive/2003/05/pr03033.html > This story is intriguing. I'd > also be curious to know what any RedHat folks on the list think about > this. What are the potential ramifications if SCO gets their way? > This appears to be the publicly announced Red Hat view of the situation: http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_rhletter.html (Thanks John Beimler for that link on IRC.) --Jeremy -- /=====================================================================\ | Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \=====================================================================/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
