On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 09:37, Greg Cox wrote: > Combining.. > > In the sense of 'Does every message needs to be verified as unaltered' > and 'people haven't learned self control in using it' and 'WHERE is > your public key so the signature does me any good,' no.
I usually GPG sign my emails. No, every message does not really need to be verified as un-altered, but one of the reasons for doing it is to raise the awareness of PGP/GPG. As far as 'where is your public key' -- the key finger print is in EVERY email I send in the signature, and the full key is on my web site (mentioned also in the SIG), and it's on all of the public key servers. Don't know how I could make it easier to find the public key. And yes, I usually do leave off the GPG signature when I know my message is going to folks with Outlook/Outlook Express who may not see it correctly. I figure TriLUG folks are smart enough to filter or ignore the attachments if they really don't want to see them (with the email clients I use, evolution, mozilla-mail, and pine, they don't get in the way anyway). Actually, TriLUG folks ought to be smart enough to ignore or filter the winmail.dat attachments too... I'm not sure the reasons for prolonging this conversation. --Jeremy -- /=====================================================================\ | Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \=====================================================================/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
