On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:02:18AM -0400, Matt Matthews wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 09:13, Jeremy Portzer wrote: > > You still need to set the ESSID. I think you're misunderstanding how > > this works. You set the ESSID on the access point to identify your > > network -- give it a unique name. Then, you set the ESSID on your > > system to match that unique name. In redhat-config-network, for > > example, this is under the "Wireless Settings" tab -- change the SSID > > setting from "Auto" to "Specified" and put in your name there. > > This is what I've done. When reset to factory defaults, for example, the > firewall has "default" (without quotes) as the ESSID. I specify that > (without quotes) in redhat-config-network for the wireless adaptor. It > never connects. I'm beginning to suspect the WAP has died. I will know > more tomorrow. Thanks.
If your neighbor also has used the "default" ssid, then keeping this value not alleviate any confusion experienced by your client. I would _HIGHLY_ recommend changing the SSID on your access point to something (anything) other than the default if only for reason of security through obscurity. This may also help your wireless client distiguish between the wireless networks (it should). If two coexisting wireless AP's have the same SSID (even if they have different WEP keys) then the client assumes that they both represent the same network and it's free to use whichever has the best signal at the time. Thus, your client may bounce back and forth or simply glob onto your neighbors if it thinks the signal's better when in fact the two networks are entirely different. Good luck, David
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
