Its time to let Carly know how we feel about their SCO support: http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/execteam/email/fiorina/index.html
FWIW, here is what I sent to her. Those who want to send something, but are two busy or whatever are welcome to use it as a boiler plate:
Dear Carly,
As a long time IT <Your Position>, I am disappointed in HP's lack of a clearly
defined position regarding SCO vs IBM/Linux law suite. As you know,
SCO is attempting to collect unfounded royalties from any organization
that is using any version of Linux that is based on the 2.4 kernel and above.
The position of HP regarding Linux has been favorable (And rightly so) for
several years now. Further, HP's support of open software has been of
great benefit to tens of thousands of companies all over the world.
As a leader in the open software community, HP is obligated to make a public statement regarding the current SCO vs IBM/Linux law suit that clearly defines HP's position and intentions regarding this litigation. HP's lack of verbosity regarding this issue has been of benefit no one. As I am sure you know, Intel has quitely withdrawn support for the up coming SCO Forum 2003 Las Vegas Trade Show. Further, Intel is not the only major industry player distancing themselves from SCO: They are one of *many*.
It is my opinion as well as the opinion of other <Your Peers> that I know that HP should seriously reconsider it's strategic business relationship with SCO.
Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to consider the the content of this email.
Best regards
Marvin P. Dickens <Your Company>
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
