Dunno about UW-IMAP, but the MS versioning is really only for marketing purposes. Win2k, for example, is actually version 5.00.2195 (I think the 2195 indicates what patch level. Or may be build number. Not sure). Windows 2000 is only a marketing thing. And no, I'm not trying to defend Windows or MS here, so flame off.
Regards, Ben Pitzer --------------------------------------------- "Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Ben Franklin-- > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Lee > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:59 AM > To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list > Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Imap/Mail server scheduled downtime > > > Jeremy Portzer wrote: > > In case you are interested, we are upgrading to the UW-IMAP 2002 suite, > > from the previous version which was 2001. This will give a slight > > performance increase, and add some additional management scrips, but > > will have no impact on features really. > > UW-IMAP doesn't really use years for its versioning does it? That just > reeks of M$-style. YUK! :-) > > -Lee > -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
