On Thursday 23 October 2003 09:09, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > but i better be careful that i don't > end up publishing the whole thing onlike. �i'm not sure that would > be smart for business. :-)
it'd be smart; go ahead; people will pay if it's good (heh-heh); then again, if it's closed you won't get the reviews from the global village that makes open source so powerful Seriously though, what do we do now? What should be open and what should be closed? If it's closed then how should it be managed? If it's free-as-in-speech but not free-as-in-beer, how is that managed - reliance on ethics of the majority? We have Stallman and McBride to guide us on open vs closed software models. Who's leading the discussion about all the options between their opposing views? -- Mike Mueller 324881 (08/20/2003) Make clockwise circles with your right foot. Now use your right hand to draw the number "6" in the air. -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
