On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 08:25 AM, Mike Mueller wrote:
I guess I could have explained the URL in a way to circumvent the filter. I
could have sent a clean pre-message announcing the upcoming arrival of the
spam-like message. Would it work to substitute angle brackets with
paranthesis and "(at)" for "@"? Any suggestions?
Sorry to post again on this subject but something hit me. The message I'm responding to is now flagged as ham rather than spam:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.60
So maybe you have been auto-whitelisted?
--
C. Magnus Hedemark
http://trilug.org/~chrish
"The only way to keep your health is to eat what you don't want, drink what you don't like, and do what you'd rather not." - Mark Twain
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
