On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 15:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The same thing could have been acheived with a weighted DNS entry or > round robin DNS no? >
No, the whole point was to get something that would work with both connections while DNS was being updated. DNS round-robin would be for load balancing or HA, not a transition setup like this. --Jeremy -- /---------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
