-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
James,
Great, thanks! However, I read that wondershaper is a real CPU hog... is that true? Also, it said it had a "small impact on bandwidth", but I think it las a very large impact: without wondershaper I was getting about 1496 Kb/s down (when my apache server isn't being hit hard), with wondershaper I was getting 492 Kb/s! That's a huge difference!
Also, does anyone know about Emerging Technologies' ET/BWMGR software? (http://www.etinc.com/)
Josh
On Nov 20, 2003, at 3:39 PM, James Manning wrote:
is there any way I can limit Apache's bandwidth usage? Or does anyone else have any god suggestions? Thanks Guys!
mod_bandwidth or mod_throttle should work for you, I'd imagine.
Much better answer, via Daniel Chen:
15:33 < crimsun> prioritizing makes more sense in this case
15:35 < crimsun> wondershaper is just a shell script 15:36 < crimsun> http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/shaper.html 15:36 < crimsun> http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/shaperd.html
http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
--
James Manning <http://www.sublogic.com/james/>
GPG Key fingerprint = B913 2FBD 14A9 CE18 B2B7 9C8E A0BF B026 EEBB F6E4
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAj++ODkACgkQdMO2CPVJoQ4BngCdHgfJ3rWiEPHUGD6BLTcL08fW JAUAnRE8AaEIhf3pQoRAbxlVw+X8MDXo =nGpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
