The group has spoken. After consulting with Tanner, it's staying as it has always been, aside from the spelling corrections Matt Frye pointed out.
William On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, stan briggs wrote: > guys, > > is there really discussion about changing anything(!), even a FAQ, > because someone got offended by jim or by jim's humor? > > this is nuts. this is reactionary. this really sounds un-necessary. > > the email about this proposal has generated more traffic on the list > than the sum of all humor, good, bad, or offensive, has in total. > > shouldn't we just drop it? > > stan -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
