On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 14:44, Tanner Lovelace wrote: > Ken Mink said the following on 2/19/04 10:21 AM: <SNIP > > If it doesn't handle the // comment style then it's not C99 compliant. > The // comment *is* valid C as of C99. If it's not compliant then > you should get them to upgrade to a modern C compiler, for crying > out loud.
My apologies. As I said I was venting. I can not upgrade. I am working on a S/390 and what IBM gives is what you get. I would love a modern compiler. I would love a modern machine, for that matter. And I have been crying out loud and in my beer. But I am employed and therefore happy to have this problem. Sorry for the disturbance, Ken > > Cheers, > Tanner > -- > Tanner Lovelace | Don't move! Or I'll fill ya full of... little > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | yellow bolts of light! - Commander John Crichton -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."--Benjamin Franklin " 'Necessity' is the plea for every infringement of human liberty; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."--William Pitt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
