David A. Cafaro said the following on 4/12/04 9:05 AM:

Ah, true, missed thought that.  You would be rejecting before you even
fully accepted the email transfer (during the SMTP connection from the
relaying mail server or the virus itself if it ran it's own SMTP).  The
reason I misunderstood that was I usually think of virus scanners
working on the email after it has been accepted from the SMTP
connection.  You setup would work, but might take some serious
processing power and time slices on the SMTP side since you would have
to partially accept the connection, scan the majority of the email
before it's been completely transfered, then reject it at the end.  When

Right, which is why I don't have a full virus checker scanning it. Instead, I just have some very good regular expressions inside postfix itself. That way it's just postfix doing the scanning and not waiting on something like spamassassin.

I was talking about silently dropping it, I was talking about after it
has been accepted by the SMTP server (thus not violating the SMTP spec,
I believe) but before delivery to the users email folder.  And you are
also right, ISP should not do this dropping with out explicit permission
from the user (though private companies should be able to do it if they
want, it's their email).  Also I am still definitely against the whole
sending notices back to the email sender if you server virus scanner
sees a virus.  More often than not the sender listed is not the infected
person, and just causes confusion and more junk email.

Agreed.


Cheers,
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace       | Don't move! Or I'll fill ya full of... little
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | yellow bolts of light! - Commander John Crichton
--
TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
TriLUG PGP Keyring         : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc

Reply via email to