Magnus Hedemark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Experience? Yes. > > Happy? Not yet. > > I haven't looked at this in awhile but my impression was that the clients > weren't really ready for WebDAV yet so its usefulness was limited at the > time. Maybe things are better now, I don't know. I think I played with > this last about a year ago.
I've used a bit of webdav inside of Apache 2.0 and it has worked fairly well. Mac OS X can mount webdav as filesystems and that part works quite well against that setup, too. There are other webdav client programs but it varies. The biggest limitation seems to be good client support. There are linux filesystem drivers and they seemed to work but I didn't really push the limits. One other option is to look at PUT inside of webdav, which more clients may support. In fact, the lftp program works great against webdav since it uses PUT as well. PUT isn't actually part of webdav (it's part of core http) but apache 2.0's mod_dav implements it nicely. (lftp is a great program even w/o that functionality; great ftp client that speaks ftp, http, ssh, etc). Chip -- Chip Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
