On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 14:54, Tanner Lovelace wrote: > I've noticed > that if you do Reply to all it will sometimes get both the poster and > the reply-to but I had assumed that was highly client dependent. For > myself, it always seems to do just what I don't want it to do. :-)
> Anyone else out there that can help shed some light on this? > I that if the original e-mail has a Reply-To: header set, mailman will *add* the list address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to the existing Reply-To: header, rather than replacing with only the list address. I tried that with this e-mail; we'll see if it works. Therefore, the Reply-To: will should end up looking like this: Reply-To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeremy Portzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [all on one line] So, the client will include both in the header when you press reply, which makes it easier to select whether you want the reply to go to the list or to the individual. You can just delete whichever you don't want. --Jeremy -- /---------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
