On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 13:57, David Rasch wrote: > People keep commenting about the processing steps in sendmail, yet > qmail which I've found to be faster then sendmail in tests and > implementations. Qmail has an architecture similar to that of postfix. > Though, I haven't tested with spam filtering, anti-virus, and other filters in > the middle. >
Qmail is a neat idea, but since it's not Free/Open Source Software, it's never been a consideration for me. I'd consider non-Free Speech software if it's the only alternative, but since sendmail and postfix are both F/OSS, it's easy to pick one of them. --Jeremy, weaning himself from pine... -- /---------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
