now see guys... be nice (even though i knew this was coming).
the problem lies in the fact that, at the current time, we are a small company and do not have the development bandwidth to concentrate on other browsers, as 98% of the visitors to our site use IE (the other 2% being Mac users). I am a OSX user, and have implemented functions that overlook the IE requirement, and allow OSX. Just this morning I received another email complaining about the IE requirement (he was a linux user too). Apparently that was all the fodder that i needed to spend the couple of hours "fixing" it so that it also allows Linux (until this time, we have had no linux users). But, we still cannot guarantee that the site will function properly under another browser because all the testing budget goes to IE (even in safari, some of the page layouts are wacky).
The change has been implemented, and the site should now come up. The only other requirement that some may gripe about is flash, and I don't believe that at this time there is much we can do about this requirement. Flash makes the nav bar at the top much faster, and considering that we have users that still connect via dialup, speed and compression are an utmost concern.
And, you're right.... It is powered by linux, but that's about as far as my input goes in the decision making. I'm just the sys admin, i don't make decisions about the code. While it is somewhat dim-witted, they also have to focus (for the time being) on the desktop market share. I don't think that anyone would disagree that most people use windows on the desktop. I don't want to start any kind of war or anything like that because i generally agree with you, but I still have to straddle both sides of the fence here.
But, I hope that despite the earlier flaw, you might give our app a second look. Feel free to contact me off list to discuss any of this, or with any questions you might have.
respectfully,
rtw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, Jun 18, 2004, at 11:35 America/Denver, Brian Henning wrote:
(why oh why would a company deliberately design their web page to exclude non-IE browsers, *especially* when your product is SUPPOSED TO RUN ON LINUX!!!!! i mean what kind of grade-A fscking moron would do that? no offense to ryan, but gee what a shock they don't have much of a user base)
That galls me to no end... The world does not revolve around Windows/IE,
despite what Microsoft would like the unsuspecting public to believe..
Increasingly less so, in fact, as certain distributions of Linux gradually
become more novice-friendly. Any company that designs a website that
requires one particular browser (especially when it's such a
standards-to-the-wind beast as IE) deserves to be shot on sight with
caution-orange-paint-loaded Super Soakers. Or maybe hot pink.
~B
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
