On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:51:06PM -0400, Matt Frye wrote: > RFC's are more useful when > they're not used to compare human beings with protocols.
RFC = Ridiculous F'ing Comments :-)? In general you are correct but wisdom appears where wisdom appears. I have a lot of respect for RFCs by the way. It's come from having spent about $1/page for ANSI and ITU specs. It's also come from having watched politics creep into NOF specifications. And finally, it's come from having observed the SIGTRAN RFCs develop over time. RFCs are developed by a meritocracy - fools are not gladly suffered in the process. -- Mike Moving forward in pushing back the envelope of the corporate paradigm. -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
