Yep, that's quite a valid point. Fortunately, this particular situation is not one where scalability is a concern.
~B ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Frye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 3:45 AM Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Exclusions in a virtmaps file > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:53:43 -0500 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I guess I would try putting a line for that user above the default line. > > Something like: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo > > @strutmasters.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is a valid solution, although not very scalable. Before you know > it, you could have 20 or thirty of these lines. Maybe it goes without > saying...someone, i.e. a winders admin, should have a talk with this > fellow about his choice of mail clients. Standardization of clients > (as many TriLUGgers can likely attest), goes a long way in preventing > serverside band-aid application, or as I like to call them > RFD's...Requests For Ducttape. > > MPF > -- > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ > TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
